Why Leaders Should Embrace the “Athena Doctrine”

Hillary-Clinton[1]                      By  Arezu  Kaywanfar

How often do you hear about the glass ceiling, the wage gap, and the setbacks that women have dealt with and continue to confront? It is so frequent that it has unfortunately become commonplace. While these inequalities are surely worthy of acknowledgement, I would like to suggest that we spend some of our time, energy, and effort reading about how women have succeeded. About the stories of women who are leaders in Fortune’s top 500, about how the number of women with six-figure incomes is rising, about the 4 out of 10 women who outearn their partners or are sole breadwinners, and about the skills and personalities that got these women to the successful podiums where they stand now.

I want to break down a few of the most positive leadership attributes that can help us get there. The traits are identified in the recently released Athena Doctrine: How Women (and the Men Who Think Like Them) Will Rule the Future by John Gerzema and Michael D’Antonio.

Gerzema and D’Antonio travelled through 18 nations and asked 64,000 people about their outlooks on the role of leadership, where society is heading, and the desperate need to adopt feminine values since, according to the authors, “people around the world feel that feminine traits correlate more strongly with making the world a better place.” Specifically, 65 percent of people around the world believe that more female leadership in government would prompt a rise in trust and fairness and a decline in wars and scandals. Hence, women unknowingly possess the qualities, traits, and values to help society turn the world into a fair and better place. Who wouldn’t want that?

You may be wondering what it is exactly that we women possess that can be utilized as an asset to benefit ourselves, our neighbors, and the world at large?

According to the book, we, as women

  • “Inspire more trust (in consumers,      co-workers, and investors) because [we] seem to listen more carefully and      empathize with others”
  • Are more likely to cooperate, collaborate,      communicate, and empathize, which are four of the idealized traits that      are classified within the Athena Doctrine
  • Embody the characteristics of morality, which      is “strongly associated with loyalty, reason, empathy, and selflessness —      all feminine traits”

Have you ever found yourself in a situation where you had to adapt, where you were flexible to cooperate, where you followed your maternal instincts and intuition, or where you openly shared your feelings?

D’Antonio and Gerzema argue that society “seeks a more expressive style of leader, one who shares feelings and emotions more openly and honestly.” So let go of the idea that Hillary Clinton crying on national television was a negative act and pride yourself in your instincts, emotions, and feelings.

I hope that you can look within yourself for the traits and strengths that you carry and can use for your own growth and for society at large. James Buchanan wrote that “the test of leadership is not to put greatness into humanity but to elicit it, for the greatness is already there.” So remind yourself that the greatness already lies within you, but the world needs leaders like us to bring out the greatness in others.

And keep in mind that these “feminine qualities” such as empathy, collaboration, and selflessness are innately possessed by both men and women. The difference is in the conscious decision to suppress versus leverage these traits. So remain optimistic and confident about the future, and embrace and deploy your feminine thinking style.

 

 

                               

 

 

Fifty Years Ago

JFK-photoWHP-AR7965-D-600x320     Fifty years ago, on June 10, 1963, President John F. Kennedy signed the Equal Pay Act into law.  At the time, white women were paid 53 cents for every dollar a man earned and women of color earned even less.   The hope was that this law would make women’s pay equal to men’s pay for equal work, but this has not happened.  Now, fifty years later women still only earn 77 cents for every dollar that men earn.  This just isn’t fair.  Now it’s time to truly honor John Kennedy and the Equal Pay act by asking our city council to issue a proclamation recognizing this important anniversary and calling on the U.S. Congress to act.  We all need to urge the passage in Congress of the Paycheck Fairness Act (H.R. 377/S.84).  Let’s fill our congressmen’s mailboxes with requests to support pay equity for women to close this unfair wage gap.  Click HERE to send a message to Congress.

Decline in Elected Women Flies Under the Radar

election_results[1]

05/30/2013 by Alexandra Bjerg

 

Voter turnout for the Los Angeles municipal election last week was depressing, but even more disheartening is the severe lack of women in elected office. The Los Angeles City Council is now just one seat away from reverting back to a Good Old Boys Club. And it gets worse. Come July 1, men will also hold all three city-wide elected offices.

That’s right, just one of 18 elected officials in Los Angeles will be a woman, despite women accounting for slightly more than 50 percent (!) of the population. Los Angeles women have experienced a decline in representation since having achieved critical mass on the city council more than a decade ago.

Surprisingly, women losing ground in the nation’s second largest city garnered little media or public attention during the election cycle.

All Californians, not just women and Angelenos, should be concerned by the setback. The drop reflects an unsettling trend that extends beyond LA’s city limits. The number of women serving in political office at all levels of government has either plateaued or declined.

California Women Lead Executive Director/CEO Rachel Michelin commented,  “Women bring a different perspective. That different perspective adds to the diversity of thought that members of [ny legislative body] need to have when they’re making public policy decisions. I think that you’re going to see a decline in certain issues and viewpoints being made because you don’t have more women[represented].”

So why aren’t more women being elected? Simply put, fewer women are running. If you don’t run, you can’t win.  Politically educated women are becoming a rare breed and this dearth is impeding the recruitment of female candidates.

“One of the problems of our political structure, whether you’re talking locally, state, or even nationally, the behind the scenes of politics, the consulting, the polling, the strategy, is still very much dominated by men,” said Michelin. The rules of politics, the rules of campaigning are written by men. We need to educate women about the rules of politics; they need to understand what goes on behind closed doors in terms of how some of those decisions are made.”

It’s vital that women have a seat at the table. Closing the gender gap by ensuring women are proportionately represented at all levels of government benefits all Californians, not just other women. Political leadership that adequately reflects the state’s diverse population helps legitimize our democracy and restore the public’s trust in government.

[Article courtesy of California Forward]

Out and About With the AAUW Riverside Branch

                           By Luis Tassan

Ashok  Kotwal

Ashok Kotwal

On May 13, 2013 a few members of the AAUW Riverside Branch attended a World Affairs Council of Inland Southern California presentation by Professor Ashok Kotwal on Why Is So Much of our Globe Still So Poor?….. How poverty can be pushed to decline.”  Professor Kotwal is a Professor of Economics and Director of the Bachelor of International Economics Program at the University of British Columbia in Vancouver, Canada.  He is also the Editor-in-Chief of Ideas for India, an economics and policy portal intended to serve as a common platform and source for ideas and On May 13, 2013 a few members of the AAUW Riverside Branch attended a World evidence on policy issues in India. http://www.ideasforindia.in/About.aspx

Professor Kotwal began his program with the stark reality that about 1.3 billion people still live on less than $1.25 a day, while 3 billion people (almost half the world population) lives on less than $2.50 a day. One fourth to one third of the children in the developing countries under the age of 5 are estimated to be underweight and have stunted growth.  UNICEF estimates that 25,000 children die EACH DAY due to reasons attributable to poverty.

With this dire reality as a backdrop Dr. Kotwal proceeded to address the following questions: 1) Why is poverty so persistent in many parts of the world? 2) Is it related to structural reasons or culture or both? 3) How can poverty decline in a sustainable way and be extended across more countries in the next 20 years? Much of the answers to this he also attributes to the work of Daron Acemoglu and James Robinson in their book Why Nations Fail (2012, New York).

In answering the first of these questions—why is poverty so persistent in many parts of the world?— Professor Kotwal introduced his audience to the terminology of “extractive” and “inclusive” institutions and their effect on poverty in a country. Using the stark examples of North and South Korea or Botswana and The Congo Professor Kotwal explains how countries with inclusive institutions—where political rights are broadly distributed and the government is accountable and responsive to its citizens, the people are better able to take advantage of economic opportunities.  In contrast, countries where poverty persists appear to be controlled by “extractive” institutions which concentrate power and opportunity in the hands of only a few for the benefit of only a few.  Hence he attributes persistent poverty to institutions and politics in those countries.

In answering the second of these questions professor Kotwal states that his research has not found that poverty is related to culture.  This came as a surprise to some in the audience who wondered how it is that the caste system in India is not a contributing factor to its persistent poverty. In answering this question professor Kotwal reinforces the notion that extractive institutions which seek control of power, resources and money for the benefit of a few are the cause of persistent poverty.

How can poverty be reduced in a sustainable way over the next 20 years? These “extractive institutions” have to evolve into “inclusive institutions” so that more people can participate in economic prosperity.  Professor Kotwal explains how countries where a large population is still engaged in the agricultural sector, where the worker is not protected by “inclusive institutions” like a labor union so that they have protections against job losses, benefits in the event of illness and protections against “unforeseen calamities” that affect their crops will continue to experience great poverty. Ideas For India (February 25, 2013. http://www.ideasforindia.in/Article.aspx?article_id=110)

Opal Singleton Talks about Human Trafficking

IMG_0012    By Taffy Geith

Jo Turner introduced our guest, Opal Singleton, Director of Development for Million Kids and Rapha House International.  Opal had seen a lot of poverty, joined a church with Rapha House in Cambodia,  met a task force for Million Kids at an NAACP meeting at Bordwell Park and then began working for Riverside County on issues involving human trafficking.

     Million Kids has developed tools such as the program, Love Trap, that teaches administrators, parents and students how to avoid this “trap”.  It seeks to form a nucleus –a group within a school, so they can identify a child who may be vulnerable—example: a runaway who may be missing, after being a chronic runaway.  Million kids received an $8,000.00 grant to work in churches so that they too, can help.

     Human trafficking is a psychological problem that can include porn addiction, sex and violent videos addiction.  Opal also talked of the Tijuana traffickers that connect sex predators from all over the world via the internet.  This is a 32 million dollar business because they have everything available—boys and girls of all ages that are lured into this trap.  Opal showed pictures of the Tijuana “line up” and of a Riverside girl who was traded to the Crips Gang in Compton.  This is a regional problem.

     This is a much abbreviated report on the excellent presentation by Opal Singleton.  She gave a much deeper analysis of the control of pimps, the intrusions of cartels and gangs on this problem and the connection of the terms: FORCE – FRAUD – COERSION in human trafficking.  Space here is limited.  One sentence that Opal gave that many will remember: “You are never so damaged you can’t come home”.  If children hear this from parents and believe it, it is a powerful tool that will stay with them.

      Opal is doing noble work in a world populated by the most vulnerable and most valuable among us.  We are better informed about this terrible problem, and we can only be more vigilant and alert in reporting any incident that involves human trafficking to the Riverside County Sheriff.IMG_0017

IMG_0014

After lunch the Riverside Branch celebrated the 70th birthday of the branch with a cake.  Quite a feat to still be going strong at 70 !